Micromanagement could slowly be killing your company.
While it’s often dismissed as inevitable in the office, the dangers of persistent micromanagement are more serious than simply hindering one project or task.
Not only can micromanagement seriously disrupt your team’s functionality and morale, but it can also directly impact your bottom line.
In this article, we’ll present real-world examples of micromanagement in the workplace. We’ll discuss micromanagement’s pros and cons and provide actionable strategies to keep it from negatively impacting your employees.
Some examples of micromanagement in the workplace include:
Micromanagement in the workplace can have some advantages, such as tight quality control, but its negative effects on employees and a company’s bottom line usually far outweigh these benefits.
Micromanagement by a team leader is best dealt with by a higher-up using the suggestions and steps laid out in this article.
A micromanager is an executive, manager, or boss who monitors and directs their employees’ work to an excessive and unnecessary extent.
Micromanagers often feel they need to have detailed oversight and be closely involved in every aspect of their team’s work. They will typically behave this way whether an employee is performing well or not.
In other words, micromanagement is not so much a type of criticism as an over-the-top desire to stay in complete control of people and processes. This makes it difficult for team members to feel trusted by their manager, and this can seriously impact their productivity.
Even employees can turn into micromanagers if they try to get too involved in their teammates’ work.
You feel like your manager is watching you, and you can’t quite put your finger on why. You and/or your work are being subtly criticized — nothing is ever good enough.
You feel belittled. You may even sense that your professional qualifications or abilities are being questioned by a superior who always knows better.
Does this sound familiar?
Unsettling workplace experiences like these can indicate your boss or supervisor is a micromanager.
Micromanagement happens in the workplace more often than people often realize. In fact, a recent study found that 73% of employees notice micromanagement and consider it a red flag. Even more telling, 46% would consider quitting their job as a direct result of micromanagement.
Micromanagement can take place in a traditional office as well as in a remote or hybrid work environment. Below are descriptions and 10 examples of micromanagement in each of these workplace settings.
A manager might think that following up on every little action is a good employee motivator; however, it’s actually counterproductive and can damage the employee’s trust and reduce their drive and creativity.
Consider the impact of these examples of micromanagement on employee morale:
Recent studies have labeled micromanagement as soul-stripping for employees who are subjected to it.
In-office employees, in particular, may feel that their actions are scrutinized to a higher degree than those of their colleagues who work from home. This can lead to declining attendance rates in the office and more requests for fully remote work.
Though virtual work may feel like an escape for overly controlled employees, micromanagement can still occur when team members aren’t in the same workplace environment as their supervisors.
Consider the following examples managers can display:
Clearly, virtual micromanagement can be just as counterproductive as micromanagement in traditional work settings. That’s why being able to identify this issue is a big part of learning how to manage hybrid work teams.
Micromanagement can be learned behavior — with managers believing it is their responsibility to closely watch their team’s output. As such, micromanagers are often unaware that their behavior is having a negative impact on their team.
This type of micromanager can be retrained in how and when to give feedback to employees, how much critique or interference is too much, and when to take a step back.
Management training like this is a helpful solution to stop micromanagement before it gets out of hand.
Though micromanagement, in general, has a bad rap in the workplace, it can have some advantages if practiced in a mindful way.
In this section, we’ll describe these advantages, followed by the more common signs and detrimental side effects of micromanagement gone wrong.
Here are some typical pros of micromanagement when done responsibly:
In micromanagement, each aspect of a project is scrutinized. This can be particularly beneficial in industries where precision is critical, such as healthcare or engineering.
Closely overseeing tasks means managers can quickly identify and rectify errors and maintain high-quality standards.
Newcomers to a company can benefit from micromanagement since it provides them with clear guidance and immediate feedback. It can help them to quickly grasp the organization’s standards and processes.
In high-stakes scenarios, such as crisis management, micromanagement can be effective in keeping all actions aligned with the desired outcome.
As mentioned, micromanagement is also associated with some serious issues in the workplace. These include the following:
Constant oversight can stifle creativity and initiative among employees. This, in turn, can lead to apathy, a lack of innovation, and dependence on guidance for every minor decision.
Employees who are micromanaged often feel undervalued and stressed, which can generate a sense of distrust and a lack of personal responsibility. This, in turn, can lead to higher turnover rates and burnout.
Micromanagers spend excessive time on supervisory tasks. This can reduce their focus on strategic planning and other critical managerial responsibilities.
Micromanagement can erode team morale if employees feel their contributions are not valued. It signals to employees that no matter how hard they try, they’ll never be fully trusted by their manager.
This lack of empowerment can result in a demotivated workforce. It can create a tense and rigid work environment where employees feel the need to constantly look busy out of fear of being criticized.
Excessive micromanagement can lead to lower company profitability due to significant direct, indirect, and hidden costs. For instance:
In short, while micromanagement can offer some short-term benefits, like error and quality control, it often has negative outcomes, like decreased creativity and inefficient managerial practices.
Employees suffering under a micromanager could address the issue with the person directly — but the situation is more effectively dealt with by the micromanager’s supervisor. This individual has the authority to confront the micromanager and discuss behavioral changes they could make.
Here are some ways a supervisor can tackle this issue:
The sequence of these steps can vary according to the situation, but taken together, they can help a micromanager lessen their control and restore trust with their team.
A micromanager’s inability to relinquish control can have a significant impact on employee productivity and turnover rates.
For your employees to enjoy their time at work, it’s important they feel trusted and empowered to do their jobs.
One way to promote autonomy is to give your employees control over where they work. Tools like OfficeRnD Hybrid can facilitate this by allowing workers to book office resources, like desks and meeting rooms, from anywhere, as well as collaborate in a manner that suits their productivity.
Micromanagement is toxic because it erodes your team’s trust. It stifles creativity and can lead to feelings of disempowerment for employees who feel that no matter what they do, their every action is scrutinized.
Even those who know they are doing an excellent job at work feel they’re being watched, judged, and overruled, both in the physical and virtual workplace. This can lead to burnout and a dread of work.
This management style, while not intentionally counterproductive, also leads to decreased morale and higher stress levels because it inhibits professional growth and skill development in workers.
If you’re dealing with a micromanaging supervisor, remain calm and approach the situation with diplomacy. Here are some helpful tips:
Remember that a micromanager isn’t deliberately trying to hurt you. Their main motivation is to ensure that the team consistently produces high-quality work.
Therefore, it’s best to approach the conversation strategically. The goal is improving the work environment for everyone, not leveling accusations that could lead to tension or conflict.
An example of micromanagement is a manager closely monitoring every step of a project, requiring frequent updates and controlling minor details, often to the detriment of team autonomy.
Signs of a micromanager include excessively monitoring employee work, reluctance to delegate tasks, and focusing on minor details rather than overall progress.
Learn what makes a good team member!
Check out what equipment you need to run a successful hybrid meeting.
Which hybrid work model is right for you. Read on to find out!
We're proud to introduce meeting services - the newest enhancement to OfficeRnD Hybrid. Read on!
Discover 12 principles of delivering exceptional customer service.
Master effective time management goal setting and increase productivity. Learn how.