Hot desking and activity-based working are two of the most common ways to organize a hybrid office, and they are easy to confuse. Hot desking gives employees any open desk on a first-come, first-served basis. Activity-based working goes a step further: it offers a range of purpose-built settings — focus zones, collaboration areas, quiet rooms and social spaces — that people move between depending on the task in front of them.
The difference matters more than ever. In its 2024 Office Occupier Sentiment Survey, CBRE found that only 40% of companies still keep a one-desk-per-employee ratio, down from 56% a year earlier, and expects that share to fall to about a third within two years. As assigned desks disappear, the question for most workplace teams is no longer whether to share space, but how to organize the space they share.
This guide covers what each model is, the pros and cons of both, how they work together, where data and AI now fit in, and how to choose the right approach for your office.
Activity-based working is just as much a way of designing an office layout as it is a way of working. In short, it gives employees a choice of purpose-built spaces and the freedom to move between them based on what they are doing at any given moment, rather than tying everyone to one assigned desk.
Activity-based working is a system created through a combination of design principles and empowered decision-making. It allows workers the freedom to choose how to work at any given time within the design.
Activity-based working aims to enable the use of in-person office time to be as efficient as possible. Companies accomplish this by designing certain areas of the office to fit the needs of specific types of work tasks.
They also focus on providing workstations that match their individual staff members’ various preferred work styles. Workers then select which area they feel will allow them to be the most productive at the moment and move around as needed throughout the day.
With activity-based working, employees gain a solid although still flexible foundation. This system enables teams to get the most out of their in-person office days rather than showing up just for the sake of meeting attendance requirements (and at the expense of productivity).
Activity-based working was originally defined as a term by a Dutch consultant named Erik Veldhoen back in 1994 as a part of his book, The Demise of the Office. However, the principle in and of itself has deeper roots going back to an American architect named Robert Luchetti.
In the 1980s, while tinkering with ways to improve office design, Luchetti thought up the concept of “activity settings” and how the principle could allow different workplace environments to serve different activities.
In 1996, Veldhoen worked to put Luchetti’s principles into action by helping a Dutch Insurance company called Interpolis redesign its offices. By applying Luchetti’s original concept of activity settings, Veldhoen successfully assisted Interpolis in maximizing its square footage, promoting workplace well-being, and productivity in their workplace.
As the “traditional”, fully in-person work environment grows more obsolete, many companies have started implementing activity-based working principles without even realizing it.
How so?
They realize that workers want more flexibility and freedom, and to retain talent, find office solutions that not only cater to that but also make sense with a partially remote staff.
Activity-based working inherently prioritizes and aligns with much of what is becoming the norm in the workplace post-pandemic. Read more about how activity-based working can help in solving hybrid work challenges.
Choice is the core of activity-based working, and it tracks closely with how people feel about the office. Gensler’s 2025 Global Workplace Survey found that employees with a high degree of choice over where and how they work are nearly three times more likely to consider their office a great place to work, and about three times more likely to stay with their employer. Check out more hybrid work stats here.
The same Veldhoen + Company study, which analyzed more than 32,000 data points across 16 organizations in 11 countries, found that individual productivity rose by 13% and group productivity rose by 8%.
This makes sense, given how an activity-based work environment specifically aims to give workers access to finely tuned spaces that cater to various work needs.
In theory, workers will take full advantage of the various spaces available to them. However, a subconscious drive toward familiarity sometimes takes over.
You may have some workers who routinely stick to certain spots even when there are other more “appropriate” places in the building for them to work on upcoming tasks. This may result in some areas being underutilized and others overcrowding.
This goes hand in hand with the topic above. Sometimes due to changes in work or project flow, you could find yourself having to restructure your space to avoid over-accommodation or underutilization.
For example, you may have a ton of need for brainstorming or collaborative space in the first half of the year that would be better utilized as “focus space” later in the year.
With the means to adjust your design, you may end up wasting space.
To squeeze activity-based working for all that it’s worth, as a facility manager, you’ll need clear insight not only into your staff’s day-to-day tasks but also into how they work – overall as a group and individually.
Without this information, you’ll struggle to make sure that your spaces can actually accommodate their intended purpose.
Hot desking is a system used in hybrid offices to allocate available desks to whoever comes in on a given day. Many managers shape their office design with hot desking in mind.
Hot desking is often incorporated alongside other systems found in hybrid offices, such as activity-based working. It’s also sometimes used on its own without any additional systems in place, and it’s a reliable method of optimizing office space.
Sure enough, to optimize your space, you need a calculator like this one to quantify the optimization.
Companies that implement hot desking recognize that in a hybrid set-up, not every staff member wants a designated desk and that by letting staff rotate through desks on an as-needed basis, they free up room for other amenities.
You may be surprised to learn that the term hot desking is derived from a phrase with origins in the US Navy – hot racking.
Hot racking was used to describe the way that sailors slept in shifts to deal with space constraints. The bunks, reported to look like racks, were said to remain steadily warm due to being used in shifts.
The concept of hot desking in the office first took root in 1993 when a Chicago-based IBM business unit utilized the practice.
If you have a hybrid team, downsizing your office space could do your budget a favor. Cutting down on space utilization with flexible designs and tactics like hot desking can cut office costs by up to 40%.
While hybrid work environments have many advantages, there are some pitfalls. One of which is your company culture taking a hit as a result of remote staff not having the same opportunities to connect with their coworkers.
While this will depend on the hybrid work policies developed by your company, some may find that offering hot-desking to otherwise remote staff enables them to truly feel like a part of the team.
In such a setup, where desk neighbors change daily, it’s easier for team members to communicate.
That boosts the company’s social culture and breeds creativity and in-person collaboration. However, to make it work flawlessly, you still need a viable hot desking policy.
Employees often enjoy decorating their desks or leaving little trinkets around that allow them to bring their personalities into the office with them. Often that helps them cope with stress.
This can serve as an icebreaker that promotes staff bonding, contributes to overall company culture, and most importantly – reminds fellow employees that their peers are human, too.
Hot desking requires that all desks remain blank slates, which means that you’ll have to work harder to keep your environment from feeling uninviting.
Hot desking doesn’t allow workers to book workspaces in advance. For this reason, many companies reserve some seating for hot desking and keep the rest for desk hoteling, which offers the benefits of hot desking while also allowing for some predictability.
This approach creates space for last-minute drop-ins while also allowing employees a bit more control over where they end up.
Since hot desking involves a high turnover of people coming and going from individual workspaces, there’s a need to spend more time on sanitation. With fixed workspaces, employees typically tend to their own desk areas.
However, with hot desking, you’ll need systems in place to ensure that things are ready for the next worker. Plus, you’ll need the right hot desking accessories some of which will help you maintain proper hot desking hygiene.
These days, we are generally seeing a more relaxed approach across the board. However, in some industries and in certain companies, maintaining clear hierarchical structures remains an important part of the workflow.
Without the tell-tale indicators of one worker being in a position of higher authority – such as a private office, it may be more challenging to uphold these types of boundaries.
You can check our article on the full pros and cons of hot desking to learn more.
At a glance, here is how the two models compare:
It is not that activity-based working is entirely different from hot desking. Rather, activity-based working is a strategic, expanded system that adds to a basic hot desking setup. Activity-based working often implements hot desking (although we prefer desk hoteling) as part of the design.
Hot desking offers flexibility, lower space requirements, room for remote staff to participate when desired, and a relatively simple set-up process. By the way, if you’re just setting up your space following an office renovation or move, check out this office move checklist.
Hot desking doesn’t offer additional design measures for improving workflow or focus specifically on offering multiple workstation options for various task types.
Activity-based working offers flexibility, multiple types of workspaces within the office, the freedom to move between workspaces throughout the day, and the capacity to operate alongside hot desking or desk hoteling.
Activity-based working doesn’t offer a “plug and play” setup process.
To be successful with this work style, you’ll need to take a broad yet detailed approach to your planning. As we’ve mentioned, this system takes considerably more forethought and financial investment when compared to hot desking.
In addition to the overall office layout you’ll need to think about:
To maximize the benefits of activity-based working, you need software that entices employees to collaborate. OfficeRnD Workplace is a hybrid work management product that brings desk booking, meeting room scheduling, and collaborative scheduling together, so teams can run hot desking or activity-based working from one place.
Its collaborative scheduling feature lets workers:
Check out the video below to see this extremely useful feature in action.
Hot desking vs. activity-based working is inherently more simple to set up. To set up hot desking, you won’t have to think as much about various types of workstations and their individual functions.
However, that’s not to say that amenities and collaborative spaces aren’t still important.
Companies that use hot desking without activity-based working often still have meeting rooms, places to troubleshoot projects with the team, and areas for lounging despite not directly focusing on “activity type” needs during the office design process.
At the end of the day, it’s about providing a basic system for efficient seating. With hot desking, staff members can get down to business much in the same way they would at the previous office, but with the added flexibility of a hybrid setting.
You’ll need:
OfficeRnD Workplace offers a stunning hot desking management solution that combines all these features and more, making organizing your hybrid office space a breeze. Check it out!
And here’s a great resource on how to implement hot desking in the office.
And here’s how you can also make desk bookings in Microsoft Teams.
In 2026, the choice between hot desking and activity-based working is less about preference and more about evidence. Most offices still run well below capacity — CBRE’s workplace research shows desk sharing is now the norm, with the majority of organizations targeting roughly 1.0 to 1.5 employees per seat — so the cost of guessing wrong is high.
That is why workplace teams increasingly let usage data drive the decision. According to Johnson Controls’ 2026 AI & Digitalization in Facilities Management report, AI-driven tools are now the top planned technology investment for facilities teams, and most organizations already use workplace management software for space planning, analytics and desk and room booking.
In practice, data and AI help in three ways when you are deciding between hot desking and activity-based working:
If you are evaluating tools, our guide to the best desk booking software for 2026 compares the options and the analytics that matter for hybrid offices.
Both hot-desking and activity-based working are popular approaches to hybrid working. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean they are both going to work well for your company. As we saw above, both systems have pros and cons.
That said, the direction of travel is clear. CBRE’s occupier research shows assigned seating has fallen from 83% to 55% of companies, while hybrid and desk-sharing models have climbed from 12% to 36% — a shift toward flexible, activity-based environments and office neighborhoods rather than one-to-one desks.
With that said, many agree that activity-based working is winning the hearts of the corporate world. Individual “one-to-one” desk seating seems to be on its way out in favor of systems that incorporate office neighborhoods.
With traditional hot desking on its own, a team member can secure a desk for the day or a meeting area to collaborate. With office neighborhoods, rather than being assigned a desk, a person is assigned to an entire area of the office with multiple seating options and suitable resources.
LinkedIn’s office is an excellent example of what activity-based working can look like:
Workers tend to value this kind of choice. Gensler’s Global Workplace Survey found that 94% of employees in the highest-performing workplaces have a choice in where they work within the office — autonomy that is closely tied to engagement and to staying with their employer.
Still, it is not always the right fit. There are cases where a basic hot desking setup makes more sense, and vice versa.
Basic Hot desking might be for you if:
Activity-based working might be for you if:
In both cases, consider investing in office ergonomics to boost your employees’ physical comfort.
Whichever model you lean toward, the smartest first step is to measure how your space is actually used. Try our free Office Space Calculator to size your desks and shared areas, then book a demo of OfficeRnD Workplace to see how desk booking, room scheduling and collaborative scheduling run hot desking and activity-based working from one place.
Hot desking gives employees any open desk on a first-come, first-served basis, with no assigned seat. Activity-based working adds a layer on top: instead of just sharing desks, the office offers a range of purpose-built settings — focus zones, collaboration areas, quiet rooms and social spaces — and employees choose the one that fits the task at hand. Hot desking is simpler and cheaper to set up; activity-based working takes more planning but better supports varied work and regular in-office days.
There is no universal number — it depends on how often your team comes in. CBRE’s occupier research shows a one-desk-per-employee ratio is now rare, and most organizations target somewhere between 1.0 and 1.5 employees per desk. The reliable way to set yours is to track several weeks of attendance and booking data, then size your shared desks so people are not regularly left without a seat on peak days.
Some of the disadvantages of hot desking include limitations on staff planning ahead, potential struggles with cleanliness due to high turnover, and difficulty in maintaining the boundaries traditionally associated with hierarchy and seniority in the office.
The opposite of hot desking would be to have a permanently assigned desk at an office that is only used by one employee.
Hot desking and activity-based working are often used in tandem. However, adding activity-based working to basic hot desking involves more planning and often requires a bigger budget. If you are a smaller company or consist of primarily remote workers, basic hot desking or desk hoteling (check out this office hoteling policy guide) may be a more appropriate choice. If you are a larger company with in-person attendance requirements, activity-based working may provide significant benefits when used alongside hot desking or desk hoteling.
The difference between hot desking and desk sharing is that with hot desking, the workspace is continuously rotated. All of the desks are shared amongst all of the staff on a first come first serve basis. With hot desking, you don’t share with any specific coworker and all personal belongings must be removed when you’re finished for the day. Check out this resource on sharing a desk in a hybrid office.
The difference between office hoteling and hot desking is that hoteling allows more room for planning. With hoteling, workers can reserve a workspace in advance rather than showing up and only being able to choose from what is currently available.